More
    HomeInternationalU.S. Trade Rep Blames Canada for Trade Deal Collapse, Not Last-Minute Demands

    U.S. Trade Rep Blames Canada for Trade Deal Collapse, Not Last-Minute Demands

    Published on

    On Wednesday, the chief trade negotiator for the Trump administration challenged Canada’s claim that last-minute demands from the U.S. caused the collapse of a trade agreement between the two nations, asserting that it was the Canadian negotiators’ issues regarding the deal’s “implementation” that led to Ottawa’s decision to withdraw.

    In a conversation with CBC News, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer mentioned that Canadian officials introduced new requests once his counterpart, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, returned from Ottawa following the tentative agreement reached on August 18.

    “We had come to what I have previously described in the media as the best deal any nation could secure with respect to Canada,” Greer told CBC News chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton during his first interview with a Canadian news organization since the trade discussions fell apart on Friday.

    “When [LeBlanc] returned, they presented some additional perspectives. They had some more requests. They brought forward items that were excessive for the United States.”

    The ambassador indicated that the timing for the two countries to reconvene for negotiations remains uncertain. He noted that he and LeBlanc had not been in contact as of Wednesday.

    “I would say we don’t currently have open communication channels,” Greer stated. “I maintain a good rapport with Minister LeBlanc, but at this moment, it seems the Canadian side is deliberating their next actions.”

    WATCH | U.S. trade rep on whether discussions might resume:

    What will it take to resume Canada-U.S. trade negotiations?

    August 26|

    Duration

    3:03

    In a Canadian exclusive interview, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBC News chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton that the path to resume trade negotiations is unclear.

    Greer’s comments, as the cabinet member responsible for implementing the president’s tariff policies, underline the differing perspectives between the two countries regarding the reasons for the breakdown in discussions. Prime Minister Mark Carney was the first to suggest that last-minute changes derailed the agreement, asserting that it was the U.S. that attempted to impose “unfair, uneconomic” revisions that “called into question the reliability of any agreement.”

    The White House has indicated that Canada rejected a proposal that would have included reductions to existing tariffs on steel, aluminum, lumber, and Canadian-manufactured vehicles.

    Regarding retaliation, Greer did not dismiss the possibility of a reciprocal response from the U.S. after Canada announced dollar-for-dollar counter-tariffs on numerous American products set to take effect following Labour Day. These tariffs are in reaction to the latest round of U.S. tariffs that began last weekend.

    “If the Canadian side retaliates further, naturally, we won’t just accept that. Our stance is, ‘Do not retaliate,'” he stated, speaking outside the White House. “I understand the sentiments in Canada and their perspectives. It’s regrettable, but it is what it is.”

    A man in a suit outside.

    Greer outside the White House on Wednesday. (Jonathan Austin/CBC)

    During a press conference on Saturday, Carney stated that the U.S. proposal would have ultimately infringed on Canada’s ability to engage in trade agreements with other nations, jeopardized essential industries, and weakened protections for the French language.

    “A favorable deal [transformed into] one we could not accept,” the prime minister remarked.

    Neither government has made the draft agreement public, and both LeBlanc and Greer have referred to confidentiality when asked about broader specifics.

    Greer indicated that the White House was ready to cut the tariff on most steel imported from Canada from 50 percent to 25 percent. This would have been subject to a tariff-rate quota system, meaning only a fraction of steel imports would qualify for the reduced rate.

    WATCH | Carney’s full remarks on Saturday:

    FULL SPEECH | Carney explains why Canada suspended trade talks with U.S.

    August 22|

    Duration

    22:59

    Prime Minister Mark Carney explained why the government chose not to sign a trade deal with American counterparts as U.S. President Donald Trump’s 50 per cent tariffs on almost $30 billion of Canadian goods are in effect. ‘We were not prepared to compromise Canada’s sovereignty or undermine our key industries,’ Carney said.

    Concerning Canadian-made vehicles, Greer noted that the tariff would have been lowered from 25 percent to 15 percent, with “the potential to decrease to seven percent.”

    Sources informed CBC News that the auto tariff could have been further reduced by increasing U.S. content, bringing the effective rate down to 7.5 percent. The Canadian side felt this offer was still inadequate, according to sources.

    Greer refuted claims that the White House sought a role in the trade agreements Canada establishes with other countries. He stated that the administration aimed for cooperation, referencing the Fortress North America concept emphasized by Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

    “We did not have any text of that nature,” Greer remarked on Wednesday. “We discussed coordinating on a bilateral basis, right? It was not a matter of ‘Canada shall’ or anything of that sort. It was a conversation about collaboration.”

    WATCH | U.S. trade rep on communication with his Canadian counterpart:

    No open channel with Canada’s trade minister, Greer says

    August 26|

    Duration

    0:17

    In a Canadian exclusive interview with CBC News chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said there isn’t currently any open channels of communication between him and Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc.

    Regarding the visibility of French content on streaming platforms, Greer stated it had been “brought up” by the White House, but not deemed a dealbreaker.

    “President Trump, myself, and the U.S. government acknowledge the significance and delicacy of the French language in Canada, especially in Quebec, the Maritimes, and several other regions. We understand that this is quite sensitive and essential,” he commented on French language protections.

    “We would never let an excellent agreement slip away over this issue. It’s not something we press hard on or make a condition or a red line. It’s far from being a red line.”

    The new measures and escalating political discourse from both sides represent a significant shift from the conciliatory atmosphere of the prior week, when it seemed the two nations were closer than ever to reaching an agreement following months of tension.

    Last week, Greer and his Canadian counterpart stood side by side in front of Greer’s office, assuring the media that they merely had to finalize minor details to conclude the agreement. That evening, U.S. President Donald Trump granted an extension on tariffs to allow negotiators to continue their work for an additional three days.

    However, by Friday, the agreement had disintegrated. When asked about last-minute requirements in an interview with CNN this week, Trump remarked: “That sounds like me.”

    Greer stated on Wednesday that the president did not intervene during the final days of negotiations, describing the comment as “spontaneous.”

    This week, Carney expressed that Canada would be willing to return to negotiations when the U.S. comes back with “the appropriate attitude.” LeBlanc informed CBC News that he and his team won’t “hurry back to Washington” until they are presented with an “economically viable” deal.

    The prime minister emphasized that the government would instead channel its efforts into strengthening trade ties with global partners and enhancing the domestic economy, reducing Canada’s reliance on the United States.

    Carney made it clear he would prefer to face the repercussions of a difficult, prolonged trade conflict rather than acquiesce to the terms put forth by the White House.

    “Some of the biggest benefits of this plan, of this transformation, will take time,” he noted.

    Latest articles

    From Nonno’s TV to Podium Glory: Hamilton’s Ferrari Journey

    Enzo Ferrari famously remarked, "If you ask any child to draw a car, they'll...

    Hayden Panettiere’s Death Ruled Accidental Due to Drug Toxicity

    The recent passing of Hayden Panettiere has been classified as accidental, linked to the...

    Stelco Steel Facility in Hamilton to Lay Off 350 Workers Amid Uncertainty

    Layoffs are currently being implemented at Stelco's steel facility in Hamilton, a process anticipated...

    Flash Floods Devastate Nepal-Tibet Border, Over 160 Confirmed Dead

    On Wednesday, devastating flash floods in a border region between Nepal and Tibet resulted...

    More like this

    From Nonno’s TV to Podium Glory: Hamilton’s Ferrari Journey

    Enzo Ferrari famously remarked, "If you ask any child to draw a car, they'll...

    Hayden Panettiere’s Death Ruled Accidental Due to Drug Toxicity

    The recent passing of Hayden Panettiere has been classified as accidental, linked to the...

    Stelco Steel Facility in Hamilton to Lay Off 350 Workers Amid Uncertainty

    Layoffs are currently being implemented at Stelco's steel facility in Hamilton, a process anticipated...