Montreal police have been expanding their array of AI-driven tools to monitor vehicles and individuals throughout the city discreetly, sparking concerns about transparency and privacy. Recently, a high-tech camera capable of scanning and recognizing vehicles was spotted on a lamppost in the Rivière-des-Prairies neighborhood by a Radio-Canada journalist. The camera, identified as a Cloudrunner CR-H2 manufactured by Genetec, a Montreal-based company, was swiftly removed following the publication of an article by Radio-Canada.
Unlike the controversial Flock Safety cameras widely used in the United States, the Genetec system not only scans license plates but also records specific vehicle details such as color, make, and model. The collected information is managed internally by its operator, distinguishing it from the centralized database approach used by Flock cameras.
According to SPVM spokesperson Marc-Antoine Bélanger, access to the captured images is restricted to investigators handling specific cases. The SPVM justifies the secrecy surrounding its technological tools as necessary to safeguard ongoing investigations and comply with legal guidelines.
However, privacy advocates argue that the rollout of new technology lacks transparency. Dominique Peschard from the Ligue des droits et libertés emphasized the importance of informing the public about police tools without compromising operational effectiveness.
The deployment of Cloudrunner cameras forms part of the SPVM’s broader adoption of AI technology. The force confirmed the use of iMotion ROC AI software from Rank One Computing to assist in analyzing extensive video footage. While denying the use of facial recognition or biometric features, SPVM spokesperson Anik de Repentigny clarified that the software focuses on identifying specific elements within videos rather than verifying individual identities.
An internal privacy impact assessment by the SPVM acknowledges potential civil liberties risks associated with the technology, such as unwarranted scrutiny of innocent bystanders and the possibility of discrimination based on visible characteristics.
The revelation about the Cloudrunner camera, initially met with confusion, was clarified by Montreal police Chief Fady Dagher, who later confirmed its usage in targeting armed violence and vehicle theft. Despite only one camera being spotted and removed, the SPVM hinted at the possibility of adding more cameras based on investigative needs.
Genetec’s vice-president, Andrew Elvish, assured that the technology prioritizes privacy and maintains detailed logs of data interactions. He highlighted the balance between privacy and security concerns, prompting communities to consider the trade-offs for public safety.
Overall, the use of advanced surveillance tools by law enforcement agencies raises questions about oversight and privacy safeguards. As Montreal continues to explore AI-driven solutions in policing, balancing security needs with individual privacy rights remains a critical challenge.